Compact Amounts at Signing and Key Dates*
Partner Country | Compact Amount (in millions) | Signed | Entry Into Force | Compact End Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Madagascar | $109.8 | 04/18/2005 | 07/27/2005 | 08/31/2009 |
Honduras | $215.0 | 06/14/2005 | 09/30/2005 | 09/30/2010 |
Cabo Verde | $110.1 | 07/05/2005 | 10/18/2005 | 10/18/2010 |
Nicaragua | $175.0 | 07/15/2005 | 05/26/2006 | 05/26/2011 |
Georgia | $395.3 | 09/12/2005 | 04/07/2006 | 04/07/2011 |
Benin | $307.3 | 02/22/2006 | 10/06/2006 | 10/06/2011 |
Vanuatu | $65.7 | 03/02/2006 | 04/28/2006 | 04/28/2011 |
Armenia | $235.7 | 03/27/2006 | 09/29/2006 | 09/29/2011 |
Ghana | $547.0 | 08/01/2006 | 02/16/2007 | 02/16/2012 |
Mali | $460.8 | 11/13/2006 | 09/18/2007 | 08/24/2012 |
El Salvador | $460.9 | 11/29/2006 | 09/20/2007 | 09/20/2012 |
Mozambique | $506.9 | 07/13/2007 | 09/22/2008 | 09/22/2013 |
Lesotho | $362.6 | 07/23/2007 | 09/17/2008 | 09/17/2013 |
Morocco | $697.5 | 08/31/2007 | 09/15/2008 | 09/15/2013 |
Mongolia | $284.9 | 10/22/2007 | 09/17/2008 | 09/17/2013 |
Tanzania | $698.1 | 02/17/2008 | 09/17/2008 | 09/17/2013 |
Burkina Faso | $480.9 | 07/14/2008 | 07/31/2009 | 07/31/2014 |
Namibia | $304.5 | 07/28/2008 | 09/16/2009 | 09/16/2014 |
Senegal | $540.0 | 09/16/2009 | 09/23/2010 | 09/23/2015 |
Moldova | $262.0 | 01/22/2010 | 09/01/2010 | 09/01/2015 |
Philippines | $433.9 | 09/23/2010 | 05/25/2011 | 05/25/2016 |
Jordan | $275.1 | 10/25/2010 | 12/13/2011 | 12/13/2016 |
Cabo Verde | $66.2 | 02/10/2012 | 11/30/2012 | 11/30/2017 |
Indonesia | $600.0 | 11/19/2011 | 04/02/2013 | 04/02/2018 |
Malawi | $350.7 | 04/07/2011 | 09/20/2013 | 09/20/2018 |
Zambia | $354.8 | 05/10/2012 | 11/15/2013 | 11/15/2018 |
Georgia | $140.0 | 07/26/2013 | 07/01/2014 | 07/01/2019 |
El Salvador | $277.0 | 09/30/2014 | 09/09/2015 | 09/09/2020 |
Ghana | $315.9 | 08/05/2014 | 09/06/2016 | 06/06/2022 |
Benin | $391.0 | 09/09/2015 | 06/22/2017 | |
Liberia | $256.7 | 10/02/2015 | 01/20/2016 | 01/20/2021 |
Morocco | $460.5 | 11/30/2015 | 06/30/2017 | |
Niger | $442.6 | 07/29/2016 | 01/26/2018 | |
Côte d’Ivoire | $536.7 | 11/07/2017 | 08/05/2019 | |
Mongolia | $350.0 | 07/27/2018 | 03/31/2021 | |
Senegal | $550.0 | 12/10/2018 | 09/09/2021 | |
Nepal | $500.0 | 09/14/2017 | ||
Lesotho | $300.0 | 05/12/2022 | ||
Kosovo | $202.0 | 07/15/2022 | ||
Timor-Leste | $420.0 | 07/18/2022 | ||
Malawi | $350.0 | 09/28/2022 | ||
Regional Transport Benin | $202.0 | 12/14/2022 | ||
Regional Transport Niger | $302.0 | 12/14/2022 |
* The values above are the signed compact amounts, except for the compacts that were extended in 2020-2021, which reflect the revised amounts. They do not reflect lower actual expenditures due to early terminations or funds not being fully spent.
Compact Commitments, Obligations, and Plan by Fiscal Year of Appropriation
Country Program | Fiscal Year of Appropriation | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 & Prior | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Total | |
Morocco | 114 | 1 | 169 | 166 | 11 | 461 | ||||||
Benin | 16 | 207 | 168 | 391 | ||||||||
Niger | 58 | 379 | 6 | 443 | ||||||||
Cote d'Ivoire | 53 | 9 | 272 | 10 | 26 | 167 | 537 | |||||
Mongolia | 100 | 1 | 95 | 154 | 350 | |||||||
Senegal | 21 | 1 | 447 | 81 | 550 | |||||||
Nepal | 108 | 10 | - | 69 | 107 | 129 | 77 | 500 | ||||
Lesotho | 145 | 113 | 43 | 300 | ||||||||
Timor-Leste | 330 | 90 | 420 | |||||||||
Kosovo | 50 | 76 | 76 | 202 | ||||||||
Malawi | 27 | 243 | 80 | 350 | ||||||||
Regional Transport Benin | 202 | 202 | ||||||||||
Regional Transport Niger | 300 | 2 | 302 | |||||||||
Committed & Obligated | 469 | 227 | 586 | 414 | 512 | 391 | 678 | 244 | 416 | 619 | 450 | 5,007 |
Country Program | Fiscal Year of Appropriation | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 & Prior | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Total | |
Tunisia | 115 | 44 | 340 | 499 | ||||||||||
Indonesia | 127 | 3 | 135 | 113 | 136 | 35 | 81 | 20 | 64 | |||||
Mozambique | 92 | 117 | 291 | 500 | ||||||||||
Regional Energy Cote d'Ivoire | 2 | 2 | 55 | 42 | 200 | 300 | ||||||||
Sierra Leone | 450 | 450 | ||||||||||||
Belize | 110 | 110 | ||||||||||||
Zambia | - | |||||||||||||
Togo | - | |||||||||||||
The Gambia | - | |||||||||||||
Regional Senegal | - | |||||||||||||
Planned | 127 | - | 5 | - | 135 | - | 2 | 375 | 222 | 35 | 197 | 651 | 760 | 2,508 |
Closed Compacts by Fiscal Year of Appropriation
As of First Quarter FY 2023 ($ in millions)
Country Program | Fiscal Year of Appropriation | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Total | |
Armenia | 177 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||
Benin | 302 | 302 | ||||||||||||||||
Burkina Faso | 475 | 475 | ||||||||||||||||
Burkina Faso II | 2 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Cabo Verde | 109 | 109 | ||||||||||||||||
Cabo Verde II | 66 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||
El Salvador | 362 | 88 | 450 | |||||||||||||||
El Salvador II | 8 | 105 | 158 | 271 | ||||||||||||||
Georgia | 290 | 24 | 17 | 56 | 387 | |||||||||||||
Georgia II | 139 | 139 | ||||||||||||||||
Ghana | 536 | 536 | ||||||||||||||||
Ghana II | 24 | 273 | 14 | 311 | ||||||||||||||
Honduras | 204 | 204 | ||||||||||||||||
Indonesia | 49 | 425 | 474 | |||||||||||||||
Jordan | 55 | 218 | 273 | |||||||||||||||
Lesotho | 358 | 358 | ||||||||||||||||
Liberia | 238 | 238 | ||||||||||||||||
Madagascar | 86 | 86 | ||||||||||||||||
Malawi | 208 | 137 | 345 | |||||||||||||||
Mali | 434 | 434 | ||||||||||||||||
Moldova | 90 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 86 | 49 | 259 | ||||||||||
Mongolia | 269 | 269 | ||||||||||||||||
Morocco | 72 | 578 | 650 | |||||||||||||||
Mozambique | 448 | 448 | ||||||||||||||||
Namibia | 219 | 76 | 296 | |||||||||||||||
Nicaragua | 113 | 113 | ||||||||||||||||
Philippines | 385 | 385 | ||||||||||||||||
Senegal | 433 | 433 | ||||||||||||||||
Tanzania | 695 | 695 | ||||||||||||||||
Vanuatu | 65 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||
Zambia | 332 | 332 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Closed Compacts | 891 | 1,242 | 1,407 | 1,400 | 1,318 | 574 | 860 | 561 | 642 | 430 | 14 | 238 | - | - | - | 2 | 3 | 9,583 |
Threshold Program Amounts at Signing and Key Dates*
Partner Country | Threshold Program Amount (in millions) | Signed | End Date |
Burkina Faso | $12.9 | 07/22/2005 | 09/30/2008 |
Malawi | $20.9 | 09/29/2005 | 09/30/2008 |
Albania | $13.9 | 04/03/2006 | 11/15/2008 |
Tanzania | $11.2 | 05/03/2006 | 12/30/2008 |
Paraguay | $34.6 | 05/08/2006 | 08/31/2009 |
Zambia | $22.7 | 05/22/2006 | 02/28/2009 |
Philippines | $20.7 | 07/26/2006 | 05/29/2009 |
Jordan | $25.0 | 10/17/2006 | 08/29/2009 |
Indonesia | $55.0 | 11/17/2006 | 12/31/2010 |
Ukraine | $45.0 | 12/04/2006 | 12/31/2009 |
Moldova | $24.7 | 12/15/2006 | 02/28/2010 |
Kenya | $12.7 | 03/23/2007 | 12/31/2010 |
Uganda | $10.4 | 03/29/2007 | 12/31/2009 |
Guyana | $6.7 | 08/23/2007 | 02/23/2010 |
São Tomé & Principe | $8.7 | 11/09/2007 | 04/15/2011 |
Kyrgyz Republic | $16.0 | 03/14/2008 | 06/30/2010 |
Niger | $23.1 | 03/17/2008 | 12/31/2015 |
Peru | $35.6 | 06/09/2008 | 09/30/2012 |
Rwanda | $24.7 | 09/24/2008 | 12/31/2011 |
Albania | $15.7 | 09/29/2008 | 07/31/2011 |
Paraguay | $30.3 | 04/13/2009 | 07/31/2012 |
Liberia | $15.1 | 07/06/2010 | 12/15/2013 |
Timor-Leste | $10.5 | 09/22/2010 | 03/31/2014 |
Honduras | $15.7 | 08/28/2013 | 05/31/2019 |
Guatemala | $28.0 | 04/08/2015 | 10/31/2021 |
Sierra Leone | $44.4 | 11/17/2015 | 03/31/2021 |
Kosovo | $49.0 | 09/12/2017 | 09/30/2022 |
Togo | $35.0 | 02/14/2019 | |
The Gambia | $25.0 | 11/16/2021 | |
Solomon Islands | $20.0 | 01/22/2022 |
* Please note that the values above are the signed threshold program amounts and do not reflect lower actual expenditures due to early terminations or funds for a threshold program not being fully spent.
Results of Recently-Closed Compacts and Threshold Programs
Ghana Compact Program
MCC marked the end of the Ghana Power Compact on June 6, 2022, with final disbursements of $311 million. The compact focused on strengthening the operation of the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) to address key challenges in the distribution of power and to support economic growth. The total estimated beneficiaries are 7.8 million over 20 years.
The compact comprised interrelated projects to help improve the quality and reliability of electricity, increase access to electricity among micro and small enterprises, and reduce energy costs. Technical assistance to ECG included installing a Geographic Information System (GIS) based distribution management system, grid digitization, and customer census to record and store basic data. Under the compact, ECG institutionalized gender responsiveness to support gender auditing, developed a gender policy, and increased its institutional capacity to implement its gender policy and enhance the capacity of female employee associations.
The compact supported activities to reduce electricity demand and increase energy efficiency that included the development of new energy efficiency standards that were approved by the Ghanian Parliament; the construction and installation of a new Air Conditioner and Refrigerator Test Laboratory, the first of its kind in West Africa, that aims to curtail the country’s importation of low-quality14,000 new, energy efficient LED streetlights; and, the retrofitting of government buildings with high energy efficiency appliances.
The compact supported construction of two bulk substations with feeders to existing primary substations serving over 600,000 utility customers, and two primary substations, the largest in the country, with interconnecting sub-transmission links and medium voltage offloading circuits serving over 800,000 utility customers. These were expected to ease overloading, help reduce technical losses and avoid extended power outages. In addition, infrastructure improvements were made to the distribution network by installing new distribution transformers and new conductors to improve the current-carrying capacity in communities and 10 markets.
Efforts to reduce commercial losses at ECG included the creation of service connection standards and normalization of existing services, strengthening the loss control program and installation of automated meter readers in the ECG target regions as well as installation of metering at critical nodes of the distribution system to provide ECG the ability to identify and monitor where technical and commercial losses are occurring.
Preliminary Results (as of Compact End Date)
Electricity Company of Ghana Financial and Operational Turnaround Project:
- 1,160 kilometers of distribution lines upgraded or built, exceeding the target of 717 kilometers
- 1,350 MVA of distribution substation capacity added, exceeding the target of 1,323 MVA
- 2 bulk supply points established, meeting the target
- 29.5 kilometers of interconnecting sub-transmission lines (33kV) added, exceeding the target of 27 kilometers
- 39.28 kilometers of medium voltage offloading lines (11kV and/or 33kV) added, exceeding the target of 22.45 kilometers
- GIS-based distribution management system in place on March 30, 2022
- 756 females participated in STEM Internship and Mentoring Program, exceeding the target of 600
Energy Efficiency and Demand Side Management Project:
- $6,046,576 of $30,000,000 targeted energy savings achieved from upgraded streetlights
- $1,650,699 of $6,000,000 targeted energy savings achieved from “race to retrofit”
- 20 products with standards developed and legislative instruments drafted, meeting the target
- 0 products (out of 20 targeted products) with legislative instruments on standards passed in Parliament
- 1 appliance test labs established, meeting the target
- 89 teachers trained on energy efficiency and conservation curriculum, exceeding the target of 84
- 9,416 out of 9,575 targeted students reached through energy efficiency and conservation curriculum
Regulatory Strengthening and Capacity Building Project:
- Capacity needs assessment completed August 23, 2017
- Tariff Plan adopted September 5, 2017
Evaluations
Electricity of Ghana (ECG) Financial and Operational Turnaround Project:
MCC’s Ghana Power Compact funded the $220 million Electricity Company of Ghana Financial and Operational Turnaround Project to improve the quality and reliability of electricity through reduced outages and cost-effective service delivery by ECG, reduce aggregate technical, commercial and collections losses, and ensure ECG can serve as a creditworthy and credible offtaker under power purchase agreements. The project supported a Private Sector Partnership and provided infrastructure investments and a number of activities focused on management systems. These activities supported the theory that introducing a private sector concessionaire and technical assistance would lead to improved management of the utility and improved power quality in Ghana.
MCC commissioned an independent performance evaluation of the project, using pre-post methodology. An evaluation design report and baseline report are available here. Final evaluation results will be available in 2025.
Line Bifurcation (Part of the Technical Loss Reduction Activity):
MCC’s Ghana Power Compact funded the $220 million Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) Financial and Operational Turnaround Project to improve the quality and reliability of electricity through reduced outages and cost-effective service delivery by ECG. The Technical Loss Reduction Activity includes investments in low voltage line bifurcation and network improvements in Accra, Ghana to reduce low voltage circuit lengths and ensure length does not impact quality of service or exceed a technical loss threshold.
MCC commissioned an independent impact evaluation of the Line Bifurcation intervention within the project, using a difference-in-differences with matching methodology. An evaluation design report and baseline report are available here. Final evaluation results will be available in 2024.
Regulatory Strengthening Project:
MCC’s Ghana Power Compact funded the $2.8 million Regulatory Strengthening and Capacity Building Project to ensure the sustainability of compact investments by supporting electricity sector regulatory reform, particularly tariff reform. The project provided tariff studies, technical assistance, and capacity building for Ghana’s electricity sector regulators. These activities supported the theory that an improved regulatory environment would lead to improved electricity quality and sector financial health, ensuring the sustainability of the power sector.
MCC commissioned an independent performance evaluation of the Regulatory Strengthening Project, using pre-post methodology. An evaluation design report and final evaluation report are available here; key evaluation findings include:
Regulatory Capacity Building
- The project successfully completed a sector capacity scan and delivered training activities to 89 regulatory personnel.
- Limited and sometimes inaccurate data, along with competing stakeholder. interests, hampered the regulator’s ability to set tariffs. However, the regulator’s primary challenge is to maintain independence in the face of political pressure.
Tariff Reform Challenges
- Stakeholders are pessimistic that the regulator will prioritize cost-recovery and cost-reflective tariffs in the foreseeable future, given political pressures.
Tariff Structure and Rates
- The project delivered high-quality tariff studies and a tariff model.
- Leadership at the regulator did not actively engage with the study activities and recommendations, likely because of political pressures.
- The regulator has not changed the tariff structure or rates in accordance with the tariff plan funded by the compact.
- Recent tariff adjustments have not moved toward cost-reflective tariffs, and the average tariff is not sufficient to cover utility operating costs.
Energy Efficiency and Demand-Side Management Project:
MCC’s Ghana Power Compact funded the $22 million dollar Energy Efficiency and Demand-side Management Project aimed to achieve greater energy efficiency and minimize power waste. The project funded the development of energy standards and labels, energy auditing, public information, and constructed energy-efficient streetlights in Accra East and West. These activities supported the theory that energy savings would reduce peak load on the electricity network.
MCC commissioned an independent performance evaluation of the Energy Efficiency and Demand-side Management Project, using pre-post methodology. An evaluation design report and baseline report are available here. Final evaluation results will be available in 2025.
Kosovo Threshold Program
MCC’s $49 million Kosovo Threshold Program, which closed in 2022, sought to address two key constraints to Kosovo’s economic growth: an unreliable supply of electricity; and real and perceived weakness in rule of law, government accountability, and transparency. MCC’s investments were designed to strengthen the power sector by fostering a market-driven approach to lowering energy costs for households and businesses, encouraging energy efficiency, and developing new sources of electricity generation. The program also supported the Government of Kosovo’s efforts to improve decision-making and accountability by increasing the accessibility and use of judicial, environmental, and labor force data.
MCC in partnership with Kosovo designed the SEEK program (Subsidies for Energy Efficiency in Kosovo), which incentivized people across the country to reduce household energy consumption and lower energy costs by subsidizing the cost of retrofitting houses and apartment buildings with energy efficiency measures, such as improving thermal insulation of walls and roofs and installing energy-efficient water heaters and furnaces. As a result, approximately 1,700 families in different municipalities across the country saved on their monthly energy bills by retrofitting their homes and apartment buildings to achieve greater energy efficiency. This pilot was an effective proof of concept for how families can be more comfortable in their homes during the wintertime, while also reducing their energy consumption. The government now has data that they can use for the scaling of similar investments going forward.
Additionally, the program worked with the Municipality of Pristina and Termokos, the utility, to install metering systems for 10,500 Termokos customers in support of the process to convert from area-based billing to consumption-based billing. This change gave residents control over their own energy bills, incentivizing them to only use what they need. The savings from household behavior change can be used to further expand the district heating system to new customers.
The Women in Energy Program took a holistic approach to address the barriers preventing women from engaging more fully in their nation’s economy. The Women in Energy Entrepreneurs (WEE) activity engaged academic institutions, the private sector, and local governments to promote greater opportunities for employment of women in Kosovo’s energy sector. WEE supported over 400 women entrepreneurs to invest in energy efficiency machinery, equipment, renewable energy technology, and building-related energy saving measures. Investments supporting women entrepreneurs have encouraged them to grow and expand their businesses locally and internationally. The Women in Energy Program also established a pipeline for future generations of women leaders in science, technology, engineering, art and math (STEAM) by giving 200 young women internships in the energy sector as well as awarding fully funded scholarships to study in STEAM related fields in the United States. The partnership between MCC and Kosovo also resulted in awareness campaigns designed to encourage women’s economic participation in the energy sector that reached more than 20,000 people in the span of eight days in 2022.
Finally, the MCC-Kosovo partnership has increased the amount of available data to promote government transparency, accountability, and data-driven decision making at all levels of government. DigData Kosovo—a program focused on four open data initiatives in the areas of energy, employment, air quality, and judicial data—crowdsourced solutions on how open data can better inform government policies. Through open data competitions, the Government of Kosovo welcomed collaboration among the public, civil society, the media, academia, think tanks, the private sector, and civil servants to promote data-driven government policies that align with the needs of the public.
Preliminary Results (as of Threshold End Date)
Reliable Energy Landscape Project:
- 26 apartment buildings retrofitted, exceeding the target of 25
- 962 out of 2,600 targeted households investing in energy efficiency
- 3,200 walk-through energy audits conducted, exceeding the target of 2,002
- $8,391,486 of incentives deployed to households, exceeding the target of $8,000,000
- Cost-effective energy efficiency model and best practices identified iteratively in September 2022 and transferred to the Government of Kosovo to inform design of future energy efficiency schemes
- 283 qualified installers, auditors and contractors from private firms, and public institutions trained, exceeding the target of 250
- 383 women entrepreneurs invested in Energy Efficiency, exceeding the target of 150
- 237 women received scholarships and internships to join the energy sector workforce, exceeding the target of 228
- 112 women employed through RELP, exceeding the target of 100
- 10,500 of 17,500 efficient district heating metering systems installed in households
- 26 trained staff from municipal utility (Termokos) and national regulatory (Energy Regulatory Office) agencies, exceeding the target of 10
- 90 out of 100 targeted renewable energy and energy efficiency projects are considered “bankable” and ready to apply for commercial loans
- 2 out of 8 targeted commercial banks offered technical assistance regarding renewable energy market standards and project finance preparation
- 11 Kosovo Credit Guarantee Fund staff or supporting consultants trained on renewable energy market standards and project finance preparation, exceeding the target of 7
Transparent and Accountable Governance Project:
- Online platform for individual case tracking and statistical data generated launched October 19, 2022
- 28 out of 120 targeted Kosovo Judicial Council, Kosovo Prosecutorial Council, and Ministry of Justice officials trained through the Public Access to Judicial Information activity
- 40,850 out of 50,000 targeted citizens interested and/or informed regarding air quality health impacts
- 13 air quality monitoring stations functional and communicating data automatically, meeting the target
- 13 out of 20 targeted partnerships formed between Government of Kosovo, civil society organizations, and the private sector
- $1,130,943 of Open Data Challenge grants awarded, exceeding the target of $834,878
- 4 datasets prepared by Millennium Foundation of Kosovo for Kosovo Open Data Challenge
Evaluations
Transparent and Accountable Governance Project:
MCC’s Kosovo Threshold Program funded the $7.2 million Transparent and Accountable Governance Project to support the Government of Kosovo’s efforts to improve decision-making and accountability by increasing the accessibility and use of judicial, environmental, and labor force data. The project supported the implementation of a case management information system to make judicial information publicly available, improvements to the collection and reporting of environmental data to the public and open data innovation competition. These activities supported the theory that public access to data will lead to more productive partnerships between government and civil society.
MCC commissioned an independent performance evaluation of the Transparent and Accountable Governance Project using contribution analysis and political economy analysis methodologies. An evaluation design report and baseline report are available here. Final evaluation results will be available in June 2024.
Reliable Energy Landscape Project:
MCC’s Kosovo Threshold Program funded the $35.5 million Reliable Energy Landscape Project to reduce the gap between energy supply and demand in Kosovo. The project provided incentives to encourage household energy efficiency and facilitate the switch to non-electric sources of heating through a pilot activity. The project also supported private-sector participation in the power sector and created opportunities for women to participate in the energy sector through both employment and entrepreneurship. The program was designed to strengthen the power sector by fostering a market-driven approach to lowering energy costs for households and businesses, encouraging energy efficiency, and developing new sources of electricity generation.
MCC commissioned an independent mixed-methods impact evaluation of the Reliable Energy Landscape Project, using interrupted time series and pre-post methodologies. An evaluation design report and baseline report are available here. Final evaluation results will be available in December 2024.
Compact Modifications
MCC employs a risk-based approach to the management of its portfolio and uses a number of mechanisms to manage projects that face potential major modifications, including the following:
- Quarterly portfolio reviews of all compacts, with a focus on high-risk projects and activities.
- Early identification of high-risk projects.
- Close collaboration with partner countries to develop plans to prevent, mitigate and manage project restructuring.
- Approval of modifications at the appropriate level.
MCC also conducts due diligence on programs in advance of compact signing to increase the reliability of technical, cost, and other estimates. During compact development, MCC makes project design modifications to mitigate potential completion risk, currency fluctuations and the potential for construction cost overruns.
Program | Project/Activity | Programmatic Change | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Niger | Irrigation and Market Access Project/Irrigation Perimeter Development Activity, Roads for Market Access Activity, Policy Reform Activity, Climate Resilient Communities Project/Climate Resilient Agriculture Activity | $14,511,927.05 million was reallocated within the Irrigation and Market Access Project, $9.4444,976.47 million was reallocated within the Climate Resilient Communities Project, $534,420.00 was reallocated out of the Monitoring and Evaluation budget to the Program Administration budget, and $4,070,618.00 was reallocated within the Program Administration budget. | The reallocations provide funding for critical works and resettlement contracts that saw delays and cost increases due to COVID-19. They also increase funds for the fertilizer reform to scale up a successful pilot and further engage the private sector. The funds will cover newly vetted costs for constructing livestock markets and small-scale irrigation under the Climate Resilient Agriculture Activity. Finally, the reallocations move excess funds from other Program Administration line items and from the M&E budget to cover the extension of the Procurement Agent contract through the end of the program. |
Projected Beneficiaries and Income Benefits by Compact
Under MCC’s results framework, beneficiaries are defined as an individual and all members of his or her household who will experience an income gain as a result of MCC’s interventions. MCC considers that the entire household will benefit from the income gain and counts are multiplied by the average household size in the area or country. The beneficiary standard makes a distinction between individuals participating in a project and individuals expected to increase their income as a result of the project. Before signing a compact, MCC estimates the expected long-term income gains through a rigorous benefit-cost analysis. MCC may reassess and modify its beneficiary estimates and/or the present value of benefits when project designs change during implementation.
Compact | Estimated Number of Beneficiaries | Estimated Net Benefits over the Life of the Project (Present Value)3 |
---|---|---|
Armenia | 428,000 | $150,400,000 |
Benin | 14,059,000 | $140,400,000 |
Benin Power | 10,600,000 | $24,800,000 |
Benin-Niger Regional | 1,600,000 | $28,040,000 |
Burkina Faso | 1,181,000 | ($123,300,000) |
Cape Verde | 385,000 | $84,600,000 |
Cape Verde II | 604,000 | $72,000,000 |
Cote d’Ivoire | 11,300,000 | $493,100,000 |
El Salvador | 706,000 | $262,100,000 |
El Salvador Investment | 6,446,000 | N/A |
Georgia | 143,000 | $166,000,000 |
Georgia II | 1,770,000 | $18,200,000 |
Ghana | 1,217,000 | $520,400,000 |
Ghana Power | 7,800,000 | ($31,000,000) |
Honduras | 1,705,000 | $252,500,000 |
Indonesia | 1,700,000 | $5,500,000 |
Jordan | 3,000,000 | $89,300,000 |
Kosovo | 1,800,000 | N/A |
Lesotho | 1,041,000 | $75,500,000 |
Lesotho Health and Horticulture | 2,500,000 | ($17,404,051) |
Liberia | 528,000 | $8,000,000 |
Madagascar | 480,000 | $46,800,000 |
Malawi | 983,000 | $234,100,000 |
Malawi Transport and Land | 5,394,000 | N/A |
Mali | 2,837,000 | $136,300,000 |
Moldova | 414,000 | ($66,700,000) |
Mongolia | 2,058,000 | $54,500,000 |
Mongolia Water | 2,430,000 | N/A |
Morocco | 1,695,000 | $610,200,000 |
Morocco Employability and Land | 1,020,131 | $844,221,542 |
Mozambique | 2,685,000 | $120,900,000 |
Namibia | 1,063,000 | $133,800,000 |
Nepal | 22,659,000 | N/A |
Nicaragua | 119,000 | $11,500,000 |
Niger | 3,888,000 | $238,700,000 |
Philippines | 125,822,000 | $159,700,000 |
Senegal | 1,550,000 | $110,600,000 |
Senegal Power | 12,800,000 | $741,503,703 |
Tanzania | 5,425,000 | $775,400,000 |
Timor-Leste | 957,721 | $81,263,971 |
Vanuatu | 14,783 | $83,500,000 |
Zambia | 1,200,000 | $62,200,000 |
Total for All Compacts | 266,007,635 | $6,597,625,165 |
Notes:
- The table includes estimates for compacts that have been signed and have economic rates of returns (ERRs) from which income benefit calculations can be drawn. The estimates are calculated using information available at the time of publication and may not capture the full count of beneficiaries and net benefits. As such, these estimates are subject to change as the compact is further developed and/or implemented and new information is available.
- These estimates do not include the projected beneficiaries of projects or activities that have been terminated or suspended by MCC (Madagascar, Honduras, Nicaragua, Mongolia, Armenia, and Burkina Faso). In the case of Madagascar, the estimates account for the compact’s early termination.
- The Present Value (PV) of Benefits is the sum of all projected benefits accruing over the life of the project, typically 20 years, evaluated at a 10% discount rate. Estimates are reported in millions of US$ in the year that the ERR analysis was completed. Because the PV of benefits uses a discount rate, these figures cannot be compared directly to the undiscounted financial costs of MCC compacts but must be compared to the PV of costs instead.
Evaluation-Based Economic Rates of Return
All MCC projects are independently evaluated, and these independent evaluations increasingly allow MCC to generate estimates of economic rates of return (ERRs) based on evaluations. Independently calculated ERRs complement the closeout ERRs that MCC calculates at the end of the compact. Because independent evaluations occur two to five years after compact closure, evaluation-based ERRs offer an updated assessment of a project’s costs and benefits post-compact. These ERRs still rely in part on forecasted benefits, given the 20-year time span over which MCC investments are assessed. Nonetheless, independent evaluation-based ERRs complete the accountability loop in a way that is rare among donors. MCC expects to have completed 50 evaluation-based ERRs by the end of FY 2023. Five examples are included in the table below.
Country | Project | Year Final Evaluation Report Published | Original ERR | Independent Evaluation-Based ERR | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indonesia | Green Prosperity: On-Grid Renewable Energy Grant Portfolio | 2019 | Between 27-30% over 20 years | Between 13-42% over 20 years | The original ERR for the three biogas grants was an average of 27%, while the average ERR for the hydro grant was 30%. The independent evaluation of the three biogas grants found ERRs of 42%, 30%, and 37%, while the ERR for the hydro grant was estimated at 13%. The main driver of the lower ERR for the hydro grant was a policy shift that reduced the amount of power that could be purchased from the grantees. |
Ghana | Community Services - WASH | 2017 | 20.5% over 20 years | 6.6% over 20 years | The updated model used for the Evaluation-Based Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) was refined to include more up-to-date estimates of disease reduction, time savings, deterioration rates, inflation, population growth, and spillover effects. The model was also modified to assume that some benefits only affect water collectors, rather than the whole population. This, in turn, lowered the overall calculated ERR. |
Ghana | Community Services - Education | 2015 | 12.1% over 35 years | Between 9.1-11% over 20 years | The updated CBA model used adjusted assumptions around incorporating the costs of preventative maintenance at schools, as well as external factors that adversely affect school facilities (such as break-ins). These adjustments resulted in a lower overall ERR. |
Philippines | KALAHI-CIDSS Community Development Grants | 2018 | 12.6% over 20 years | 3% over 20 years | While program investments in roads, water, and education produced large gains, these gains were offset by very large losses in rice productivity. If these rice losses are excluded, the project’s ERR rises to 28%. |
Mozambique | Farmer Income Support | 2016 | 25.1% over 20 years | 16.8% over 20 years | The ex-post ERR was lower than was originally assumed due to higher observed disease prevalence rates in 2014 between treatment and comparison areas surveyed and a more aggressive disease spread than originally calculated. In addition, the model was updated due to lower-than-expected survival rates of seedlings from 71 percent in year 3 to 60 percent (epidemic) and 43 percent (endemic) in year 5. |
Compact Portfolio Investments by Sector
Cumulative, as of First Quarter FY 2023
MCC Results
Implementation Results by Sector
MCC and its country partners develop and tailor monitoring and evaluation plans for each program and country. Within these country-specific plans, MCC uses common indicators to standardize measurement and reporting within key investment sectors. See below for a subset of common indicators that summarize implementation achievements across all programs in MCC’s key investment sectors as of December 2022.
Common Indicator | Achievements since 2005 | Active and Closed Programs Measured |
---|---|---|
Farmers trained | 426,495 | Armenia, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde I, El Salvador I, Ghana I, Honduras, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mali, Moldova, Morocco I, Morocco II, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger |
Farmers who have applied improved practices as a result of training | 127,112 | Armenia, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde I, El Salvador I, Ghana I, Honduras, Madagascar, Mali, Moldova, Nicaragua, Niger |
Enterprises that have applied improved techniques | 1,016 | Armenia, Burkina Faso, El Salvador I, Ghana I, Madagascar, Moldova, Morocco I |
Hectares under improved irrigation | 203,963 | Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde I, Ghana I, Honduras, Mali, Moldova, Morocco I, Senegal I |
Common Indicator | Achievements since 2005 | Active and Closed Programs Measured |
---|---|---|
Educational facilities constructed or rehabilitated | 873 | Burkina Faso, El Salvador I, El Salvador II, Georgia II, Ghana I, Mongolia I, Namibia |
Instructors trained | 10,621 | Burkina Faso, El Salvador I, El Salvador II, Georgia II, Mongolia I, Morocco I |
Students participating in MCC-supported education activities | 394,840 | Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, El Salvador I, El Salvador II, Georgia II, Ghana I, Guatemala, Mongolia I, Morocco I, Namibia |
Graduates from MCC-supported education activities | 62,938 | BBurkina Faso, El Salvador I, Georgia II, Mongolia I, Morocco I, Namibia |
Common Indicator | Achievements since 2005 | Active and Closed Programs Measured |
---|---|---|
Megawatts of generation capacity added | 113 | Indonesia, Liberia, Malawi |
Megavolt amps of substation capacity added | 2,756 | Ghana II, Liberia, Malawi, Tanzania |
Kilometers of electricity lines upgraded or built | 6,083 (3,780 miles) |
El Salvador I, Ghana I, Ghana II, Indonesia, Liberia, Malawi, Tanzania |
Customer connections added by project | 44,507 | El Salvador I, Indonesia |
Common Indicator | Achievements since 2005 | Active and Closed Programs Measured |
---|---|---|
Legal and regulatory reforms adopted | 135 | Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde II, Ghana I, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mongolia I, Morocco II, Namibia |
Land administration offices established or upgraded | 399 | Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde II, Ghana I, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mali, Mongolia I, Mozambique |
Land rights formalized | 320,722 | Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde II, Lesotho, Mongolia I, Mozambique, Namibia, Senegal I |
Parcels corrected or incorporated in land system | 361,634 | Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde II, Ghana I, Lesotho, Mongolia I, Morocco II, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Senegal I |
Common Indicator | Achievements since 2005 | Active and Closed Programs Measured |
---|---|---|
Kilometers of roads under design | 4,773 (2,966 miles) |
Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde I, Cote d’Ivoire, El Salvador I, El Salvador II, Ghana I, Honduras, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Niger, Philippines, Senegal, Tanzania, Vanuatu |
Kilometers of roads under works contracts | 4,260 (2,647 miles) |
Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde I, El Salvador I, El Salvador II, Georgia I, Ghana I, Honduras, Mali, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Niger, Philippines, Senegal, Tanzania, Vanuatu |
Kilometers of roads completed | 3,563 (2,214 miles) |
Armenia, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde I, El Salvador I, Georgia I, Ghana I, Honduras, Mali, Moldova, Mongolia I, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Philippines, Senegal, Tanzania, Vanuatu |
Common Indicator | Achievements since 2005 | Active and Closed Programs Measured |
---|---|---|
Individuals trained in social and behavior change | 73,116 | Cabo Verde II, El Salvador I, Ghana I, Indonesia, Mozambique, Zambia |
Sanitation facilities constructed | 32,831 | Cabo Verde II, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mozambique |
Kilometers of water pipelines constructed or replaced | 1,661 (1,032 miles) |
Cabo Verde II, Jordan, Lesotho, Sierra Leone THP, Zambia |
Millions of liters per day of water production capacity added | 220 | Liberia, Tanzania |
Independent Evaluations
MCC commissions independent evaluations, conducted by third-party evaluators, for every project it funds. These evaluations hold MCC and country partners accountable for the achievement of intended results and produce evidence and learning to inform future programming. They investigate the quality of project implementation, the achievement of the project objective and other targeted outcomes, and the cost-effectiveness of the project.
As of January 2023, MCC has published 46 interim and 128 final independent evaluation reports. The graphs below present the number of interim and final reports that MCC has published, by sector and evaluation type. Impact evaluations estimate changes in outcomes that are attributable to MCC investments. Performance evaluations estimate the contribution of MCC investments to changes in outcomes.
FY 2023 Corporate Goals/Priorities
- Deliver a clear and impactful MCC@20 vision
Build and deliver a more relevant and higher impact MCC@20.
- Deliver on the MCC@20 vision.
- Tell the MCC Story.
- Align MCC for Success in the Future.
- Design, Deliver, and Evaluate High-Quality Compacts, Threshold, and Regional Programs
Identify, track, and achieve key milestones in a timely manner with country partners to develop, implement, and evaluate compact, threshold, and regional programs on budget and on schedule.
- Support the timely achievement of identified key milestones for all programs in development.
- Support the achievement of identified milestones for programs in implementation and close out.
- Reduce compact development timelines (from selection to signing and signing to entry into force).
- Support the completion and dissemination of evaluation results and other learning products.
- Integrate Policy Priorities to Achieve Quality Economic Growth that is Sustainable, Inclusive, and Private sector-led
- Address Climate Change consistent with MCC’s Climate Strategy.
- Integrate Inclusion and Gender as defined in MCC’s Inclusion and Gender Strategy.
- Catalyze private investment in and around MCC programs and projects to maximize scale and impact, including through USG agencies such as DFC, USAID, and Department of State.
- Improve MCC’s Operational Efficiencies and Effectiveness, including driving MCC’s agility and responsiveness to both HQ and field needs
- In Headquarters and the field, enhance, streamline, and modernize MCC’s operations to increase impact and better manage risk.
- Ensure all MCC and MCA staff are informed and continue to follow agency-wide policies and procedures, while reviewing and streamlining them, and leveraging technology when and where possible.
- Support MCC’s data-driven culture and provide leadership with feedback that allows for continuous improvement in the quality and speed of strategic decision-making.
- Promote innovation and learning around program implementation and timelines.
- Delegate and strengthen country ownership of programs and accountability for implementation and results.
- Refine MCC’s Human Capital and Resource Capabilities and Foster a Diverse, Equitable, Inclusive, and Accessible (DEIA) Culture
- More effectively recruit, deploy, and retain resources to meet MCC’s mission and achieve program objectives, including the ability to scale and resource the evolving scope and impact of MCC programs and projects.
- Implement hybrid modalities that are flexible and facilitate engagement, productivity, and agility while continuing to prioritize the health and safety of staff.
- Develop and approve a Human Capital Strategic Implementation Plan, including a review and assessment of the Human Capital and Resourcing model.
- Support the agency and leadership on ensuring resources are adequately managed to uphold MCC’s mission in the most efficient manner and align them to assist in meeting MCC’s strategic corporate goals.
- Enhance agency-wide operations to drive corporate effectiveness, efficiency, and compliance.
- Institutionalize DEIA programs and related activities.